From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lindent fixed to match reality
Date: 30 Jan 2004 14:08:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1n085xhyu.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040129201556.GK16675@khan.acc.umu.se>
David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:37:28PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I've been fiddling with cleaning up some old code here and suggest the
> > following to make Lindent match actual practice more closely. This does:
> >
> > a) (no -psl)
> >
> > void *foo(void) {
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > void *
> > foo(void) {
> >
> > b) (no -bs) "sizeof(foo)" rather than "sizeof (foo)"
>
> I can't really see the logic in this, though I know a lot of people do
> it. I try to stay consistent, thus I do:
If consistency was good in a language we would all be using
an RPL or s-expr based language. Communication is clearer
with redundant information. Making special cases of common
cases is a good thing.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-29 19:37 Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-29 20:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 20:15 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-29 20:35 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-29 20:42 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-29 20:52 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-29 21:46 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 22:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-29 22:54 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-29 23:17 ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-29 23:43 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-30 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-30 17:49 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-30 21:08 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-01-29 20:17 ` Roland Dreier
2004-01-29 20:37 ` Erik Hensema
2004-01-29 21:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-01-30 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-30 10:38 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1n085xhyu.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®