From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, YhLu <YhLu@tyan.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Peter Buckingham <peter@pantasys.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.12 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:54:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1oe9nlg4m.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050630185418.GD7226@plap.qlogic.org> (Andrew Vasquez's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:54:18 -0700")
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com> writes:
>> A couple more tidbits of information on this problem.
>>
>> 1) I have seen this on two different boards
>> a Tyan S4882 and a Arima HDAMA, with and without linuxbios.
>> In just messing around adding "debug" on the kernel command line
>> or changing Dprintk in smpboot.c:smp_callin() to printk,
>> avoids this boot lock up for me.
>
> All,
>
> Has there been any resolution to this problem. I've just tried
> 2.6.13-rc1 on a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (dual-proc em64t) and am running
> into what appears to be a similar case where cpu initialization never
> completes. I'll attach my .config, boot-up messages, and the output
> of lspci.
>
> I've also tried the s/Dprintk/printk/ hack with no success.
I can confirm that I am seeing this on Xeons as well with my problem
2.6.12 kernel. And specifying debug does cause it to go away, for me.
As for which debug messages cause the bug not to be trigger I am
logging to the serial console which may be part of the difference.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-30 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-24 23:47 YhLu
2005-06-29 2:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-30 18:54 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-06-30 20:54 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-29 1:01 YhLu
2005-06-24 23:42 YhLu
2005-06-24 23:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-24 18:56 YhLu
2005-06-23 0:07 YhLu
2005-06-23 0:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-22 23:37 YhLu
2005-06-22 23:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-21 22:50 YhLu
2005-06-21 23:55 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-21 22:17 YhLu
2005-06-21 21:41 YhLu
2005-06-21 22:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-22 22:26 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-06-22 23:10 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-22 23:31 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-06-21 22:36 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1oe9nlg4m.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=YhLu@tyan.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@pantasys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome