mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msi: Only keep one msi_desc in each slab entry.
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:16:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1psgcharn.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0607110951240.12720@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI> (Pekka J. Enberg's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:55:56 +0300 (EEST)")

Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI> writes:

> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Please look at what the code changes.
>> Please recognize how very bad the current code is behaving.
>
> Yes, there's plenty of slab confusion going on.
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> As for the rest sure go ahead and create a patch to address it
>> but that really is a separate issue and thus a separate patch.
>> 
>> I'm just trying to keep the kernel from calling BUG_ON the first
>> time a msi irq is allocated on a kernel with a maximum NR_CPUS
>> configuration, and from wasting memory the rest of the time.
>> 
>> Or you know how bad the msi code is when every patch to fix a major
>> issue is followed up comments on how to improve the code even further.
>
> Ok.

Looks good to me. 

> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 36bc7c4..77b08ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -45,16 +45,11 @@ msi_register(struct msi_ops *ops)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void msi_cache_ctor(void *p, kmem_cache_t *cache, unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -	memset(p, 0, NR_IRQS * sizeof(struct msi_desc));
> -}
> -
>  static int msi_cache_init(void)
>  {
>  	msi_cachep = kmem_cache_create("msi_cache",
> -			NR_IRQS * sizeof(struct msi_desc),
> -		       	0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, msi_cache_ctor, NULL);
> +			sizeof(struct msi_desc),
> +		       	0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL, NULL);
>  	if (!msi_cachep)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -402,11 +397,10 @@ static struct msi_desc* alloc_msi_entry(
>  {
>  	struct msi_desc *entry;
>  
> -	entry = kmem_cache_alloc(msi_cachep, SLAB_KERNEL);
> +	entry = kmem_cache_zalloc(msi_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!entry)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	memset(entry, 0, sizeof(struct msi_desc));
>  	entry->link.tail = entry->link.head = 0;	/* single message */
>  	entry->dev = NULL;
>  

      reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-10 22:00 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11  6:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-11  6:42   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-11  6:55     ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-11  7:16       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1psgcharn.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome