From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI document
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:40:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1r6mptcc8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185851583.23149.30.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (Ying Huang's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:13:03 +0800")
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> This patch adds document for EFI x86_64 support. The boot parameters
> added are documented in Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt. The setup
> and operation guide of EFI based system is documented in
> Documentation/x86_64/uefi.txt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> i386/zero-page.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> x86_64/uefi.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt 2007-07-30
> 11:28:45.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt 2007-07-30
> 11:29:28.000000000 +0800
> @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
> 0xb0 - 0x13f Free. Add more parameters here if you really need them.
> 0x140- 0x1be EDID_INFO Video mode setup
>
> -0x1c4 unsigned long EFI system table pointer
> -0x1c8 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor size
> -0x1cc unsigned long EFI memory descriptor version
> +0x1c4 unsigned long EFI system table pointer*
> +0x1c8 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor size*
> +0x1cc unsigned long EFI memory descriptor version*
> 0x1d0 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor map pointer
> -0x1d4 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor map size
> +0x1d4 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor map size*
> 0x1e0 unsigned long ALT_MEM_K, alternative mem check, in Kb
> 0x1e4 unsigned long Scratch field for the kernel setup code
> 0x1e8 char number of entries in E820MAP (below)
> @@ -87,3 +87,13 @@
> 0x2d0 - 0xd00 E820MAP
> 0xd00 - 0xeff EDDBUF (edd.S) for disk signature read sector
> 0xd00 - 0xeeb EDDBUF (edd.S) for edd data
> +
> +Changes for x86_64 implementation:
> +---------------------------------
> +For alignment purposes, the following parameters are rearranged.
> +
> +0x1b8 unsigned long EFI system table pointer
> +0x1c0 unsigned long EFI Loader signature
> +0x1c4 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor size
> +0x1c8 unsigned long EFI memory descriptor version
> +0x1cc unsigned long EFI memory descriptor map size
Huh? It is the same protocol. Unless there are specific issues such
as pointers being to small we should remain 100% the same for both
arch/i386 and arch/x86_64 This variation looks like a serious
bug.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 3:13 Huang, Ying
2007-07-31 4:40 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-07-31 6:58 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-01 17:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-07 9:29 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-07 9:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 8:18 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-08 10:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 13:46 ` Huang, Ying
2007-08-08 14:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 15:11 ` huang ying
2007-08-08 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 16:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-08 16:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-08 17:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-08-09 9:47 Etienne Lorrain
2007-08-09 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 14:09 ` huang ying
2007-08-09 16:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-09 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 17:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-10 13:03 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1r6mptcc8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mouli@linux.intel.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome