From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reparent kernel threads to swapper
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:04:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1slb7v9oc.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410185222.GA107@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:52:22 +0400")
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> A lot of kernel threads parented to /sbin/init slow down do_wait() when
> a non-detached (user-space) process exits. Change reparent_kthread() to
> use init_task as a parent. Since init_task can't go away, we don't need
> to put the caller on init_task.children list.
Is there any downside of putting tasks on init_task.children?
If not it is probably a good idea to put processes there just for good measure.
> NOTE: pstree doesn't show kernel threads with this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
>
> --- 2.6.21-rc5/kernel/exit.c~3_SWAPPER 2007-04-10 21:59:41.000000000 +0400
> +++ 2.6.21-rc5/kernel/exit.c 2007-04-10 22:25:25.000000000 +0400
> @@ -255,11 +255,11 @@ static int has_stopped_jobs(struct pid *
> }
>
> /**
> - * reparent_kthread - Reparent the calling kernel thread to the init task of
> the pid space that the thread belongs to.
> + * reparent_kthread - Reparent the calling kernel thread to swapper.
> *
> * If a kernel thread is launched as a result of a system call, or if
> - * it ever exits, it should generally reparent itself to init so that
> - * it is correctly cleaned up on exit.
> + * it ever exits, it should generally reparent itself so that it is
> + * correctly cleaned up on exit.
> *
> * The various task state such as scheduling policy and priority may have
> * been inherited from a user process, so we reset them to sane values here.
> @@ -272,9 +272,8 @@ void reparent_kthread(void)
>
> ptrace_unlink(current);
> remove_parent(current);
> - current->parent = init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
> + current->parent = &init_task;
> current->real_parent = current->parent;
> - add_parent(current);
>
> /* make the task auto-reap */
> current->exit_signal = -1;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-11 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 18:52 Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-11 4:04 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1slb7v9oc.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®