From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] tref: Implement task references.
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:39:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1slpv58yd.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440CA459.6627024C@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:06:33 +0300")
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> I think I have a really good idea.
>
> Forget about task ref for a moment. I thinks we can greatly
> simplify the pids management. We don't PIDTYPE_MAX hash tables,
> we need only one.
>
> The plan:
>
> kill PIDTYPE_TGID
> (copy_process/unhash_process need a simple fix)
Worth doing. But I think it is an independent problem.
I almost wonder if it is possible to let the thread group leader
exit, at which point we really would need PIDTYPE_TGID.
Or do you need this to have the thread list embedded in the task_struct?
> kill 'struct pid'
>
> Now,
>
> struct task_struct
> {
> ...
> struct list_head pids[PIDTYPE_MAX];
> struct list_head tgrp;
> ...
> };
>
> static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return list_entry(p->tgrp.next, struct task_struct, tgrp);
> }
>
> struct pid_head
> {
> pid_t nr;
> struct hlist_node chain;
> struct list_head tasks[PIDTYPE_MAX];
> };
pid_head is decent but I am very tempted to call this struct pid.
Especially if we start getting a lot of pointers to them a simple
name that makes sense is useful.
> kernel/pid.c:
>
> static kmem_cache_t *pid_cachep;
>
> static struct hlist_head *pid_hash;
> #define pid_bucket(nr) (pid_hash + pid_hashfn(nr))
>
> // alloc_pidmap() becomes static,
> // do_fork() calls this instead
> struct pid_head *alloc_pid(void)
> {
> struct pid_head *pid;
>
> pid = kmem_cache_alloc(pid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (likely(pid)) {
> enum pid_type type;
>
> for (type = 0; type < PIDTYPE_MAX; ++type)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(pid->tasks + type);
>
> pid->nr = alloc_pidmap();
> hlist_add_head_rcu(&pid->chain, pid_bucket(pid->nr));
> }
>
> return pid;
> }
Hmm. I guess that works. I'm tempted to still return just a pid_t.
I guess I can't see how the struct pid_head, will be used.
There may be another problem here as well. I don't think we have a lock
at this point that makes us safe to update the hash table.
> static struct pid_head *find_pid(pid_t nr)
> {
> struct hlist_node *node;
> struct pid_head *pid;
>
> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pid, node, pid_bucket(nr), chain)
> if (pid->nr == nr)
> return pid;
>
> return NULL;
> }
I'm pretty certain there are uses for find_pid, outside of pid.c
> And noe we can inplement pid_ref almost for free, just add ->count
> to 'struct pid_head'.
If we want to kill the tasklist_lock we also want to add a lock
to struct pid_head. Otherwise I don't see how we can safely bump
the count, above zero. But using the tasklist_lock for the first
version shouldn't be a problem.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-07 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 15:52 [PATCH 00/23] proc cleanup Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 15:54 ` [PATCH 01/23] tref: Implement task references Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 02/23] proc: Fix the .. inode number on /proc/<pid>/fd Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 15:57 ` [PATCH 03/23] proc: Remove useless BKL in proc_pid_readlink Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 15:58 ` [PATCH 04/23] proc: Remove unnecessary and misleading assignments from proc_pid_make_inode Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:00 ` [PATCH 05/23] proc: Simplify the ownership rules for /proc Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 06/23] proc: Replace proc_inode.type with proc_inode.fd Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 07/23] proc: Remove bogus proc_task_permission Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/23] proc: Kill proc_mem_inode_operations Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 09/23] proc: Properly filter out files that are not visible to a process Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:10 ` [PATCH 10/23] proc: Fix the link count for /proc/<pid>/task Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:12 ` [PATCH 11/23] proc: Move proc_maps_operations into task_mmu.c Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:15 ` [PATCH 12/23] proc: Rewrite the proc dentry flush on exit optimization Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:16 ` [PATCH 13/23] proc: Close the race of a process dying durning lookup Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 14/23] proc: Make PROC_NUMBUF the buffer size for holding a integers as strings Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:20 ` [PATCH 15/23] proc: refactor reading directories of tasks Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH 16/23] proc: Don't lock task_structs indefinitely Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:24 ` [PATCH 17/23] proc: Give the root directory a task Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:25 ` [PATCH 18/23] proc: Reorder the functions in base.c Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:27 ` [PATCH 19/23] proc: Modify proc_pident_lookup to be completely table driven Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink " Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:30 ` [PATCH 21/23] proc: Factor out an instantiate method from every lookup method Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:32 ` [PATCH 22/23] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:34 ` [PATCH 23/23] proc: Merge proc_tid_attr and proc_tgid_attr Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-23 16:49 ` [PATCH 01/23] tref: Implement task references Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-02 19:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-02 20:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-02 22:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-03 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-03 17:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-04 11:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-04 12:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-04 17:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-06 21:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-06 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-07 20:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-07 1:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-03-07 20:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-07 13:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-07 21:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-07 23:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-03 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-04 10:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-25 12:27 ` [PATCH 00/23] proc cleanup Andrew Morton
2006-02-25 13:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-25 15:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-27 15:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-02-27 15:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1slpv58yd.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®