From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030611AbXDJWbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030619AbXDJWbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:31:07 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:40408 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030611AbXDJWas (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:30:48 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu References: <461BC4B6.9060006@goop.org> <461C0D70.50005@goop.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:30:03 -0600 In-Reply-To: <461C0D70.50005@goop.org> (Jeremy Fitzhardinge's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:19:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> I think I have already done this but in case I haven't. >> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" >> >> I see any problems there. >> > ^don't? Yep. I did not see any problems with the patch. Eric