From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263541AbTJOQ01 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:26:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263543AbTJOQ01 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:26:27 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:16484 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263541AbTJOQ0Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:26:25 -0400 To: root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: Hartmut Zybell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ld-Script needed OR (predicted) Architecture of Kernel 3.0 ;-) References: <20031014114135.68297.qmail@web80702.mail.yahoo.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 15 Oct 2003 10:24:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Richard B. Johnson" writes: > > Also, we have a module loader and unloader that allows modules > to be inserted and removed from a running system. There are > even experimental systems that allow the whole kernel to be > changed without (apparent) re-booting. Any pointers. I have heard rumors but I have never seen an actual implementation. Even one that failed in a lot of cases. Eric