From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751306AbXCOSZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:25:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751316AbXCOSZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:25:24 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:57663 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbXCOSZV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:25:21 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Dave Jones Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: 2.6.21rc suspend to ram regression on Lenovo X60 References: <20070313040828.GA17893@redhat.com> <200703131022.54322.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070313132218.GA25910@redhat.com> <20070315181059.GA1644@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:24:21 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20070315181059.GA1644@redhat.com> (Dave Jones's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:10:59 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones writes: > I just did a build of top of tree, including those commits, and > it's still broken. Booting with pci=nomsi no longer 'fixes' it > though, which may indicate that the MSI changes were a red herring. > (Or that the subsequent changes have regressed it even more, > which seems unlikely looking at the changes). > > .. or it could be something else introduced between rc3 (which is > what my bisect was based on) and todays tree. > > sigh. I'll do more bisecting after lunch. Thanks. It is good to know that things are worse, even if that isn't good news. Eric