From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@infradead.org>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Natalie Protasevich" <protasnb@gmail.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] x86_64 irq: Begin consolidating per_irq data in structures.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:27:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1vehmkda6.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5986589C150B2F49A46483AC44C7BCA4907458@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:28:07 -0800")
"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@amd.com> writes:
>
> Why not use
>
> IRQ0_VECTOR... IRQ15_VECTOR here.
I do by the end of the patch series it was a patch ordering issue.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-28 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-27 21:28 Lu, Yinghai
2007-02-28 6:27 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
[not found] <200701221116.13154.luigi.genoni@pirelli.com>
2007-02-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 irq: Handle irqs pending in IRR during irq migration Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-08 20:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-09 6:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-10 23:52 ` What are the real ioapic rte programming constraints? Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-11 5:57 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2007-02-11 10:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-11 16:16 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2007-02-11 22:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-12 1:05 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2007-02-12 4:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 10:51 ` Conclusions from my investigation about ioapic programming Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:10 ` [PATCH 0/14] x86_64 irq related fixes and cleanups Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86_64 irq: Simplfy __assign_irq_vector Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:13 ` [PATCH 02/14] irq: Remove set_native_irq_info Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:15 ` [PATCH 03/14] x86_64 irq: Kill declaration of removed array, interrupt Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:16 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86_64 irq: Remove the unused vector parameter from ioapic_register_intr Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:19 ` [PATCH 05/14] x86_64 irq: Refactor setup_IO_APIC_irq Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:20 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86_64 irq: Simplfiy the set_affinity logic Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] x86_64 irq: In __DO_ACTION perform the FINAL action for every entry Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] x86_64 irq: Use NR_IRQS not NR_IRQ_VECTORS Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 09/14] x86_64 irq: Begin consolidating per_irq data in structures Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1vehmkda6.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai.lu@amd.com \
--cc=zwane@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome