From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754617AbXLCBer (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:34:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751914AbXLCBei (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:34:38 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:44011 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbXLCBeh (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:34:37 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Kay Sievers" Cc: "Greg KH" , "rae l" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable. References: <91b13c310712011231k3604214bx3559387c568cce09@mail.gmail.com> <20071202044825.GA7004@suse.de> <91b13c310712012252k5307735x782582fd2d7abd94@mail.gmail.com> <20071202075437.GA19897@suse.de> <20071202225320.GA23359@suse.de> <3ae72650712021646r8376bb9s73e326db5789839d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:33:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3ae72650712021646r8376bb9s73e326db5789839d@mail.gmail.com> (Kay Sievers's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:46:57 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Kay Sievers" writes: > That cruft is going away with the block patch in your tree. And it doesn't matter because it is a separate mount anyway. Although I have to admit I hadn't taken that mount into account earlier. Eric