mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@colin2.muc.de>,
	Mika Penttil? <mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	David Hinds <dhinds@sonic.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI memory allocation bug with CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Date: 07 Jan 2004 08:06:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1wu83lrxf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040107093143.A29200@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:58:23PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > ffff0000-ffffffff : reserved
> > 
> > That last reserved region is 64K.  Which looking at the pci registers
> > is technically correct at the moment.  Only 64K happen to be decoded.
> 
> We already have this distinction between in use (or busy) resources and
> allocated resources.  Surely the BIOS ROM region should be an allocation
> resource not a busy resource, so that the MTD driver can obtain a busy
> resource against it?

Nope the BIOS region is allocated as BUSY, at least as it comes
out of the E820 map.

>From arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:legacy_init_iomem_resources
....
		res -> start = e820.map[i].addr;
		res -> end = res->start + e820.map[i].size - 1;
		res -> flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
		request_resource(&iomem_resource, res);

Eric




  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-07 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1aJdi-7TH-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-06  3:32 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  3:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  4:05     ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  5:04       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  8:12         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06  9:11           ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06  9:44             ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 10:16               ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06 10:49                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 15:37                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:48                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 22:29                     ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07  4:06                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  5:02                         ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07  5:55                           ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07  6:06                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  6:08                               ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07  6:45                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  6:51                             ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07  2:43                               ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07  8:32                       ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-06 22:45                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  0:06                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07  4:58                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  5:32                         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 15:53                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 16:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 17:32                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-08 19:34                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07  9:31                         ` Russell King
2004-01-07 15:06                           ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-01-07 20:29                             ` Russell King
2004-01-06 22:56     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-05 20:07 David Hinds
2004-01-05 23:00 ` Russell King
2004-01-05 23:45   ` David Hinds
2004-01-06  0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  0:44   ` David Hinds
2004-01-06  1:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06  1:41       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1wu83lrxf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=ak@colin2.muc.de \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=dhinds@sonic.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.penttila@kolumbus.fi \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome