From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753318Ab0CASoc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:44:32 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:49313 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998Ab0CASoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:44:30 -0500 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com, iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, trenn@suse.de Subject: Re: [LKML] Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() References: <4B882182.4030205@kernel.org> <20100227130113.GA18661@elte.hu> <4B897537.5050406@kernel.org> <20100301164602.GG7881@phenom.dumpdata.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:44:23 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20100301164602.GG7881@phenom.dumpdata.com> (Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk's message of "Mon\, 1 Mar 2010 11\:46\:02 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on in02.mta.xmission.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes: >> >> > so far this patch only affect (fix ) x3950. > > .. snip .. >> > other solution will ask IBM to fix their bios, so we can get > > It isn't just IBM. Asus P2B-D (PIIX4) and SuperMicro X8DAL (possibly) > seem to have the same issue. > > (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg00715.html) > and > (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg01239.html) I can't find the reference to those boards in the email you quoted. Xen does strange and very different things with it's irqs so it is unlikely to be the same issue. Eric