From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758399AbZBZEU1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:20:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753200AbZBZEUS (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:20:18 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:47803 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751832AbZBZEUQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:20:16 -0500 To: Arve =?utf-8?B?SGrDuG5uZXbDpWc=?= Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , pm list , Len Brown , Jesse Barnes , Thomas Gleixner References: <200902221837.49396.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090226030050.GA3361@elte.hu> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:20:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: ("Arve =?utf-8?B?SGrDuG5uZXbDpWciJ3M=?= message of "Wed\, 25 Feb 2009 20\:13\:27 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.169.126.145;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.169.126.145 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: arve@android.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@goop.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?;Arve Hj=c3=b8nnev=c3=a5g ?= X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arve Hjønnevåg writes: > We only have one gpio input driver, but I don't think is good to loose > any wakeup interrupts. Any driver that needs an edge triggered wakeup > interrupt will have problems if the hardware does not regenerate the > interrupt when the host does not respond. We are not loosing interrupts. The normal implementation of disable is a software disable and sets IRQ_PENDING to ensure we don't loose interrupts when the interrupt is disabled. Eric