From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262379AbTJISld (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:41:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262395AbTJISld (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:41:33 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:36414 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262379AbTJISlc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:41:32 -0400 To: Cherry George Mathew Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , fastboot@osdl.org, lkml Subject: Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7) References: <20031008172235.70d6b794.rddunlap@osdl.org> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 09 Oct 2003 12:40:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cherry George Mathew writes: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct > > kexec syscall number (274). > > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+ series kernels. Or is it the law > the Jungle ? So far the law of the jungle. Regardless of the rest it looks like it is time to submit a place keeping patch. Eric