From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756067AbYKMXp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:45:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753925AbYKMXpe (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:45:34 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:55244 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753116AbYKMXpd (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:45:33 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, containers@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] proc: Implement support for automounts in task directories References: <20081106172617.dd51d0af.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081106184945.179c248a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081106202822.a1af8a6e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081107080529.6f4de3ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:39:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20081107080529.6f4de3ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:05:29 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=mx04.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=24.130.11.59;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:40:56 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx04.mta.xmission.com); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On this patchset it looks like the conversation has wound down with no real objects except that some very simple pieces of the code appear magic. What looks to be the best path for getting this set of patches merged into /proc? Alexy will you pick this up in your /proc tree as Andrew suggested? Do I need to keep my own tree? Can I have some clear guidance on which hurdles to jump through to make forward progress? Eric