From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755403AbYIDVOy (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:14:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754102AbYIDVOm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:14:42 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:40699 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754016AbYIDVOk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:14:40 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dwmw2@infradead.org, sam@ravnborg.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de References: <20080903191619.6b6b230e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080903214634.ea17ff53.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080903223318.84b6ce8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904012544.cabed847.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904015701.5959623a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904104554.32ffebea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904113408.d47c65f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080904134148.0fde4508.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:03:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080904134148.0fde4508.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:41:48 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=mx04.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=24.130.11.59;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: too long (recipient list exceeded maximum allowed size of 128 bytes) X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Andrew Morton X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0001] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:40:56 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx04.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:31:01 -0700 > ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > >> >> are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches >> >> floating around between Eric/Al? >> > >> > yup, it's yesterday's mainline. >> >> Does the problem happen if you disable selinux? >> >> This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous. > > yeah, adding `selinux=0' to the boot command line fixes it. The proc generic directory back structure is the same. As requested by the selinux folks. So I don't expect there is much more we can do on the /proc side. When we get the interaction bug between the VFS and /proc/net fixed I wonder if there will be some more selinux fall out. Something to think about. Eric