From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751449AbVHVWmX (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:42:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751453AbVHVWmX (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:42:23 -0400 Received: from zeus1.kernel.org ([204.152.191.4]:13196 "EHLO zeus1.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751434AbVHVWmU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:42:20 -0400 To: e8607062@student.tuwien.ac.at Cc: linux-kernel , Elliot Lee Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6 1/2] New Syscall: get rlimits of any process (update) References: <1124326652.8359.3.camel@w2> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:15:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1124326652.8359.3.camel@w2> (Wieland Gmeiner's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:57:31 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wieland Gmeiner writes: > (This resembles the behaviour of the ptrace system call.) ptrace does not solve this problem because? If you can do this now without a syscall why do you need a syscall to optimize this code path? Eric