From: Juan Quintela <quintela@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Remove PF_MEMDIE as it is redundant
Date: 09 Jan 2003 00:49:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2lm1v6w2g.fsf@demo.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1042066824.694.3634.camel@phantasy>
>>>>> "robert" == Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> writes:
robert> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 17:47, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> PF_MEMDIE don't have any use in current kernels. Please
>> remove, we only set it in one place, and there we also set
>> PF_MEMALLOC. And we only test it in other place, and we also
>> test for PF_MEMALLOC. This patch has existed in aa for some
>> quite time.
robert> I independently thought this same thing, and did a patch for 2.5 which
robert> had the same effect.
robert> I was reminded by better-VM-hackers-than-I that PF_MEMALLOC can be
robert> cleared in various paths so the PF_MEMDIE is required to ensure that the
robert> check in page_alloc.c is always true for OOM'ed tasks.
That is a nice theory, and I think that this could be true in the
past, but in 2.4.2X, PF_MEMDIE only appears in the two places that I
show, and it is completely redundant, look at the patch, we are just
|-ing both PF_MEMALLOC and PF_MEMDIE and later we are &-ing against
the or of the two. Use find & grep yourself if you don't believe me.
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-08 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-08 22:47 Juan Quintela
2003-01-08 23:00 ` Robert Love
2003-01-08 23:49 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2003-01-08 23:46 ` Robert Love
2003-01-09 0:01 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2lm1v6w2g.fsf@demo.mitica \
--to=quintela@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome