mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Gary.Mohr@Bull.com" <Gary.Mohr@bull.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:32:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2q7c86c4471004210132id258e98y47134ab3bd486efe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271837295.3794.3.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>

Seems to me that struct pmu is a shared resource across all CPUs.
I don't understand why scheduling on one CPU would have to impact
all the other CPUs, unless I am missing something here.


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 20:03 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 19:55 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>>
>> > > One thing not on that list, which should happen first I guess, is to
>> > > remove hw_perf_group_sched_in(). The idea is to add some sort of
>> > > transactional API to the struct pmu, so that we can delay the
>> > > schedulability check until commit time (and roll back when it fails).
>> > >
>> > > Something as simple as:
>> > >
>> > >   struct pmu {
>> > >     void start_txn(struct pmu *);
>> > >     void commit_txn(struct pmu *);
>> > >
>> > >     ,,,
>> > >   };
>> >
>> > Could you please explain a bit more?
>> >
>> > Does it mean that "start_txn" perform the schedule events stuff
>> > and "commit_txn" perform the assign events stuff?
>> >
>> > Does "commit time" mean the actual activation in hw_perf_enable?
>>
>> No, the idea behind hw_perf_group_sched_in() is to not perform
>> schedulability tests on each event in the group, but to add the group as
>> a whole and then perform one test.
>>
>> Of course, when that test fails, you'll have to roll-back the whole
>> group again.
>>
>> So start_txn (or a better name) would simply toggle a flag in the pmu
>> implementation that will make pmu::enable() not perform the
>> schedulablilty test.
>>
>> Then commit_txn() will perform the schedulability test (so note the
>> method has to have a !void return value, my mistake in the earlier
>> email).
>>
>> This will allow us to use the regular
>> kernel/perf_event.c::group_sched_in() and all the rollback code.
>> Currently each hw_perf_group_sched_in() implementation duplicates all
>> the rolllback code (with various bugs).
>>
>>
>>
>> We must get rid of all weak hw_perf_*() functions before we can properly
>> consider multiple struct pmu implementations.
>>
>
> Thanks for the clear explanation.
>
> Does below patch show what you mean?
>
> I only touch the x86 arch code now.
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |  161 +++++++++++--------------------------
>  include/linux/perf_event.h       |   10 ++-
>  kernel/perf_event.c              |   28 +++----
>  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 626154a..62aa9a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>        if (n < 0)
>                return n;
>
> +       if (!(event->pmu->flag & PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED))
> +               goto out;
> +
>        ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign);
>        if (ret)
>                return ret;
> @@ -953,6 +956,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>         */
>        memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n*sizeof(int));
>
> +out:
>        cpuc->n_events = n;
>        cpuc->n_added += n - n0;
>
> @@ -1210,119 +1214,6 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
>        return &unconstrained;
>  }
>
> -static int x86_event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event,
> -                         struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> -{
> -       int ret = 0;
> -
> -       event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE;
> -       event->oncpu = smp_processor_id();
> -       event->tstamp_running += event->ctx->time - event->tstamp_stopped;
> -
> -       if (!is_x86_event(event))
> -               ret = event->pmu->enable(event);
> -
> -       if (!ret && !is_software_event(event))
> -               cpuctx->active_oncpu++;
> -
> -       if (!ret && event->attr.exclusive)
> -               cpuctx->exclusive = 1;
> -
> -       return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static void x86_event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> -                           struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> -{
> -       event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
> -       event->oncpu = -1;
> -
> -       if (!is_x86_event(event))
> -               event->pmu->disable(event);
> -
> -       event->tstamp_running -= event->ctx->time - event->tstamp_stopped;
> -
> -       if (!is_software_event(event))
> -               cpuctx->active_oncpu--;
> -
> -       if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu)
> -               cpuctx->exclusive = 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Called to enable a whole group of events.
> - * Returns 1 if the group was enabled, or -EAGAIN if it could not be.
> - * Assumes the caller has disabled interrupts and has
> - * frozen the PMU with hw_perf_save_disable.
> - *
> - * called with PMU disabled. If successful and return value 1,
> - * then guaranteed to call perf_enable() and hw_perf_enable()
> - */
> -int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *leader,
> -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> -              struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> -{
> -       struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
> -       struct perf_event *sub;
> -       int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
> -       int n0, n1, ret;
> -
> -       if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       /* n0 = total number of events */
> -       n0 = collect_events(cpuc, leader, true);
> -       if (n0 < 0)
> -               return n0;
> -
> -       ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n0, assign);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> -
> -       ret = x86_event_sched_in(leader, cpuctx);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> -
> -       n1 = 1;
> -       list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> -               if (sub->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
> -                       ret = x86_event_sched_in(sub, cpuctx);
> -                       if (ret)
> -                               goto undo;
> -                       ++n1;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       /*
> -        * copy new assignment, now we know it is possible
> -        * will be used by hw_perf_enable()
> -        */
> -       memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n0*sizeof(int));
> -
> -       cpuc->n_events  = n0;
> -       cpuc->n_added  += n1;
> -       ctx->nr_active += n1;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * 1 means successful and events are active
> -        * This is not quite true because we defer
> -        * actual activation until hw_perf_enable() but
> -        * this way we* ensure caller won't try to enable
> -        * individual events
> -        */
> -       return 1;
> -undo:
> -       x86_event_sched_out(leader, cpuctx);
> -       n0  = 1;
> -       list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> -               if (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> -                       x86_event_sched_out(sub, cpuctx);
> -                       if (++n0 == n1)
> -                               break;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       return ret;
> -}
> -
>  #include "perf_event_amd.c"
>  #include "perf_event_p6.c"
>  #include "perf_event_p4.c"
> @@ -1454,6 +1345,47 @@ static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>        x86_perf_event_update(event);
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Set the flag to make pmu::enable() not perform the
> + * schedulablilty test.
> + */
> +static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +       pmu->flag |= PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED;
> +}
> +
> +static void x86_pmu_stop_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +       pmu->flag &= ~PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Return 0 if commit transaction success
> + */
> +static int x86_pmu_commit_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +       struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
> +       int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
> +       int n, ret;
> +
> +       n = cpuc->n_events;
> +
> +       if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
> +               return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +       ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * copy new assignment, now we know it is possible
> +        * will be used by hw_perf_enable()
> +        */
> +       memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n*sizeof(int));
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct pmu pmu = {
>        .enable         = x86_pmu_enable,
>        .disable        = x86_pmu_disable,
> @@ -1461,6 +1393,9 @@ static const struct pmu pmu = {
>        .stop           = x86_pmu_stop,
>        .read           = x86_pmu_read,
>        .unthrottle     = x86_pmu_unthrottle,
> +       .start_txn      = x86_pmu_start_txn,
> +       .stop_txn       = x86_pmu_stop_txn,
> +       .commit_txn     = x86_pmu_commit_txn,
>  };
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index bf896d0..93aa8d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -524,6 +524,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
>
>  struct perf_event;
>
> +#define PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED 1
> +
>  /**
>  * struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
>  */
> @@ -534,6 +536,11 @@ struct pmu {
>        void (*stop)                    (struct perf_event *event);
>        void (*read)                    (struct perf_event *event);
>        void (*unthrottle)              (struct perf_event *event);
> +       void (*start_txn)               (struct pmu *pmu);
> +       void (*stop_txn)                (struct pmu *pmu);
> +       int (*commit_txn)               (struct pmu *pmu);
> +
> +       u8 flag;
>  };
>
>  /**
> @@ -799,9 +806,6 @@ extern void perf_disable(void);
>  extern void perf_enable(void);
>  extern int perf_event_task_disable(void);
>  extern int perf_event_task_enable(void);
> -extern int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
> -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> -              struct perf_event_context *ctx);
>  extern void perf_event_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event);
>  extern int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event);
>  extern struct perf_event *
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 07b7a43..4537676 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -83,14 +83,6 @@ extern __weak const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>  void __weak hw_perf_disable(void)              { barrier(); }
>  void __weak hw_perf_enable(void)               { barrier(); }
>
> -int __weak
> -hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
> -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> -              struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> -{
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void)       { }
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_disable_count);
> @@ -642,14 +634,13 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
>               struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>  {
>        struct perf_event *event, *partial_group;
> +       struct pmu *pmu = (struct pmu *)group_event->pmu;
>        int ret;
>
>        if (group_event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
>                return 0;
>
> -       ret = hw_perf_group_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +       pmu->start_txn(pmu);
>
>        if (event_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx))
>                return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -664,16 +655,21 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
>                }
>        }
>
> -       return 0;
> +       ret = pmu->commit_txn(pmu);
> +       if (!ret) {
> +               pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
>
>  group_error:
> +       pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
> +
>        /*
> -        * Groups can be scheduled in as one unit only, so undo any
> -        * partial group before returning:
> +        * Commit transaction fails, rollback
> +        * Groups can be scheduled in as one unit only, so undo
> +        * whole group before returning:
>         */
>        list_for_each_entry(event, &group_event->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> -               if (event == partial_group)
> -                       break;
>                event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>        }
>        event_sched_out(group_event, cpuctx, ctx);
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-19 19:41 Corey Ashford
2010-01-20  0:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20  1:49   ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-20  9:35     ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20 19:28       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-20 13:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 21:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 23:23     ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-21  7:21       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-21 19:13         ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-21 19:28           ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-27 10:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-27 19:50               ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 10:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 18:00                   ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 19:06                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 19:44                       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 22:08                       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-29  9:52                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 23:05                           ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-30  8:42                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-01 19:39                               ` Corey Ashford
2010-02-01 19:54                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  8:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  8:47     ` stephane eranian
2010-01-21  8:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  9:16         ` stephane eranian
2010-01-21  9:43         ` stephane eranian
     [not found] ` <d3f22a1003290213x7d7904an59d50eb6a8616133@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-30  7:42   ` Lin Ming
2010-03-30 16:49     ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-30 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 22:12         ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-31 14:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-31 14:13             ` stephane eranian
2010-03-31 15:49             ` Maynard Johnson
2010-03-31 17:50             ` Corey Ashford
2010-04-15 21:16         ` Gary.Mohr
2010-04-16 13:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19  9:08             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-19  9:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 11:55             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-20 12:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21  8:08                 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  8:32                   ` stephane eranian [this message]
2010-04-21  8:39                     ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  8:44                       ` stephane eranian
2010-04-21  9:42                         ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  9:57                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 22:12                             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21 14:22                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 22:38                                 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21 14:53                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 21:28       ` stephane eranian
2010-03-30 23:11         ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-31 13:43           ` stephane eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2q7c86c4471004210132id258e98y47134ab3bd486efe@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=Gary.Mohr@bull.com \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®