From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:47:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:47:18 -0500 Received: from hakva-2.student.nlh.no ([128.39.180.186]:29964 "EHLO hakva-2.student.nlh.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:47:06 -0500 To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ps hang in 241-pre10 In-Reply-To: <3A724FD2.3DEB44C@reptechnic.com.au> <3A7295F6.621BBEC4@Home.com> <3A731E65.8BE87D73@pobox.com> <3A7359BB.7BBEE42A@linux.com> <94voof$17j$1@penguin.transmeta.com> From: "Håvard Kvålen" Date: 28 Jan 2001 04:46:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Does anybody have a clue about what is different with xmms? > > Does it use KNI if it can, for example? We used to have a problem > with KNI+Athlons, for example. No, it doesn't. > It might also be that it's threading-related, and that XMMS is one > of the few things that uses threads. Things like that. I'm not an > XMMS user, can somebody who knows XMMS comment on things that it > does that are unusual? Yes, threads could be the thing that makes a difference. I can't think of anything else that is special about XMMS. -- Håvard Kvålen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/