From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:54:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38x614g37.fsf@maximus.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47166C83.2050207@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (Stefan Richter's message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:11:47 +0200")
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes:
> What I meant was: First revisions may have had incomplete OHCI 1.1
> support and were sold as OHCI 1.0 chips, and as soon as they stabilized
> it they sold them as OHCI 1.1 chips. But that's mere speculation on my
> part. I can't think of any other reason though why anybody would hide
> OHCI 1.1 compatibility.
Perhaps some MS Windows had troubles with 1.1?
VIA has a history of similar things (e.g. some C3 CPUs).
All 3 chips I have, including that dated 2002, are single
revision "80" so I guess there are absolutely no silicon changes.
> And are you going to test if and how stable OHCI 1.1 features work?
> (Which features are these? Right now only dual buffer reception comes
> to my mind.)
On this old EPIA? No :-)
At least unless I have any doubt.
On the other machine (currently) 1.0? Sure, that's why I did it.
Is the "dual buffer reception" involved in receiving video from
a DV camera, using the new driver?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m3sl4ciz1h.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
[not found] ` <4714EF01.2060609@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2007-10-16 20:20 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-16 20:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-16 21:06 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-17 19:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-17 20:11 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-17 20:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2007-10-17 21:06 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-18 0:07 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-19 22:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-20 6:31 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-20 13:03 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-20 13:13 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-20 23:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-28 17:41 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-28 20:40 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-10-28 23:12 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-29 12:53 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-11-03 19:15 ` Stefan Richter
2007-11-04 16:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-11-04 19:31 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-11-04 23:00 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-11-05 18:25 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-11-05 19:14 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38x614g37.fsf@maximus.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®