From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030210AbWFIR6q (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:58:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030289AbWFIR6q (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:58:46 -0400 Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:24251 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030210AbWFIR6p (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:58:45 -0400 X-Comment-To: Jeff Garzik To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , Alex Tomas , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 References: <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609174146.GO1651@parisc-linux.org> <4489B4CB.7060001@garzik.org> From: Alex Tomas Organization: HOME Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:00:41 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4489B4CB.7060001@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:50:03 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org IMHO, 3 (three) if's for a whole fs don't look that bad. on the other side, you'd need to audit much more of almost the same lines ... thanks, Alex >>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes: JG> With extents and 48bit, you have multiple code paths to audit, regardless. JG> If applied to ext3, you have to audit JG> fs/ext3/*.c: JG> if (extents) JG> ... JG> else JG> ... JG> as opposed to JG> fs/ext3/*.c: JG> ... non-extent code JG> fs/ext4/*.c: JG> ... extent code