From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965213AbWFIUsI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:48:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965219AbWFIUsI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:48:08 -0400 Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:20143 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965213AbWFIUsG (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:48:06 -0400 X-Comment-To: Joel Becker To: Alex Tomas Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , Chase Venters , Linus Torvalds , Andreas Dilger , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 References: <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <1149880865.22124.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4489CB42.6020709@garzik.org> <20060609204418.GG3574@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> From: Alex Tomas Organization: HOME Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:49:54 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060609204418.GG3574@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (Joel Becker's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:44:18 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> Joel Becker (JB) writes: JB> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:35:43PM +0400, Alex Tomas wrote: >> that's your point of view. mine is that this option (and code) >> to be used only when needed. JB> Which is irrelevant. If you tell the world "extents are JB> better!", they're going to turn them on regardless of whether you JB> consider their situation a good candidate. Many non-kernel-hackers JB> started using reiserfs before it was usably stable, just because JB> "journaling is better!" I haven't said that so far. I feel absolutely comfortable to put as many warnings as needed from your point of view. thanks, Alex