From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750895AbWFNQoZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:44:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750846AbWFNQoY (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:44:24 -0400 Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:21404 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbWFNQoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:44:23 -0400 X-Comment-To: grundig To: grundig Cc: Alex Tomas , jeff@garzik.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, chase.venters@clientec.com, adilger@clusterfs.com, akpm@osdl.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org> <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <1149880865.22124.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4489CB42.6020709@garzik.org> <20060611221438.cecef685.grundig@teleline.es> From: Alex Tomas Organization: HOME In-Reply-To: <20060611221438.cecef685.grundig@teleline.es> (grundig@teleline.es's message of "Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:14:46 +0200 (added by postmaster@terra.es)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:45:50 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> grundig (g) writes: g> Distros may ignore your opinion and may enable it, and users won't know g> that it's enabled or even if such feature exist - until they try to run g> an older kernel. If almost nobody needs this feature, why not avoid g> problems by not merging it and maintaining it separated from the g> main tree? not sure, in such a distro such an user will be aware he's using ext4. about "nobody needs ...": see my question regarding NUMA in kernel. thanks, Alex