From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>, "Robert Hancock" <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Black box flight recorder for Linux
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3k69xkygp.fsf@defiant.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604100754340.25546@chaos.analogic.com> (linux-os@analogic.com's message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:18:01 -0400")
"linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@analogic.com> writes:
> Further, in a boot where the BIOS needs to initialize hardware,
> It will write all RAM before enabling NMI. This makes sure that
> the parity bit(s) are set properly. Most BIOS will attempt to
> preserve RAM on a 'warm' boot as a throw-back to the '286 days
> with their above-1MB-memory-manager paged RAM because the
> only way to get back from protected mode to 16-bit real mode
> was a hardware reset.
I think there is no distinction WRT RAM test between cold and warm
boot anymore. If the BIOS clears the RAM is, I think, determined by
the "fast POST" option in BIOS setup (it always checks the size
so some bytes will be changed anyway).
> When using a memory-manager like DOS's
> HIMEM.SYS, you might actually be rebooting the machine hundreds
> of times per second!
Yes but it uses (or, rather, used) a CMOS flag to skip POST (not only
the RAM test) and to go directly to the entry point in real mode.
IIRC (I may be wrong, that was 15+ years ago) only 286 required
KBC reset to return to real mode (did LOADALL matter?), 386s have
no such problem.
BTW I understand the idea have nothing to do with actual aircraft,
so it would be the admin rather than NTSB looking at the data(?).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5ZjEd-4ym-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5ZlZk-7VF-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-08 14:05 ` Robert Hancock
2006-04-08 7:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-08 16:28 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-04-08 22:28 ` JustFillBug
2006-04-09 17:09 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-04-10 18:53 ` Ville Herva
2006-04-09 15:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-09 19:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-04-10 12:18 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-10 19:44 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2006-04-10 20:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-08 22:45 linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-08 11:12 James Courtier-Dutton
2006-04-08 13:41 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-08 19:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-04-08 16:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-04-08 17:30 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-04-09 19:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-04-10 12:01 ` Andy Green
2006-04-10 19:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-04-19 10:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-06-06 17:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-06-07 8:03 ` Jean Delvare
2006-06-07 10:18 ` Andy Green
2006-06-07 23:52 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-04-11 11:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-10 3:06 ` Russell Senior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3k69xkygp.fsf@defiant.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®