From: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pktcdvd stack usage regression
Date: 09 Feb 2006 07:01:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lkwl6pfu.fsf@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060209020932.GY3524@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> writes:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> your recent patch "pktcdvd: Allow larger packets" changed
> PACKET_MAX_SIZE in the pktcdvd driver from 32 to 128.
>
> Unfortunately, drivers/block/pktcdvd.c contains the following:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> static void pkt_start_write(struct pktcdvd_device *pd, struct
> packet_data *pkt)
> {
> struct bio *bio;
> struct page *pages[PACKET_MAX_SIZE];
> int offsets[PACKET_MAX_SIZE];
> ...
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> With PACKET_MAX_SIZE=128, this allocates more than 1 kB on the stack
Yes, I know.
> which is not acceptable considering that we might have only 4 kB stack
> altogether.
Why is it not acceptable? The pkt_start_write() function is only
called from the kcdrwd() kernel thread and the pkt_start_write()
function doesn't call anything else in the kernel that could require
lots of stack space.
The actual I/O is started from pkt_iosched_process_queue(), which
calls generic_make_request(). However pkt_iosched_process_queue() is
on a different call chain than pkt_start_write(), so I don't see how
this could be a problem.
--
Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com
http://web.telia.com/~u89404340
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-09 2:09 Adrian Bunk
2006-02-09 6:01 ` Peter Osterlund [this message]
2006-02-10 14:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-10 20:56 ` Peter Osterlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3lkwl6pfu.fsf@telia.com \
--to=petero2@telia.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome