From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: ext2-devel@lists.sf.net
Cc: ext3-users@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ext3 htree brelse problems look to be fixed!
Date: 04 Mar 2003 18:57:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3of4q4rdl.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org> (raw)
I just booted 2.5-bk current as of last night with the below patch¹
(which was recently posted to ext3-users) that un-static-ifies a
struct dx_frame in namei.c.
I then did my best torture test for the brelse bug: starting gnus
(3600+ nnmh folders² with a total of XXX messages; it does a readdir
on each of those folders) while doing bk consistancy checks in 2.5
and/or 2.4 kernel trees. All while fetchmail+procmail+spamd processes
a stream of incoming mail.
That load had never failed to generate a brelse in the syslog; each
occurance of brelse in the syslog correlated to a short readdir. In
gnus the short readdir would result in temporarily missing mail; in bk
the consistancy check would fail. If the bk check was the result of a
pull, a manual bk resync would be required to fix the tree. (Or one
could remove the RESYNC and PENDING dirs and re-pull.)
The bug did not occur during the torture test. Even with three bk
checks in parallel (2.5 current, 2.4 current and a clone of a clone of
2.5 as of yesterday.)
I beleive (with this patch) htree is now ready for prime time.
-JimC
² one message per file in seq(1) order, ala old-style usenet spools
¹ the patch as posted by Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> is:
===== namei.c 1.15 vs edited =====
--- 1.15/fs/ext3/namei.c Wed Oct 2 01:24:11 2002
+++ edited/namei.c Sun Mar 2 00:05:03 2003
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@
struct dx_hash_info hinfo;
struct buffer_head *bh;
struct ext3_dir_entry_2 *de, *top;
- static struct dx_frame frames[2], *frame;
+ struct dx_frame frames[2], *frame;
struct inode *dir;
int block, err;
int count = 0;
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-04 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-04 23:57 James H. Cloos Jr. [this message]
2003-03-05 8:24 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-05 2:32 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2003-03-06 0:44 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3of4q4rdl.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org \
--to=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®