From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754866AbYICMUJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754866AbYICMUJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:20:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751312AbYICMT6
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:19:58 -0400
Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:49743 "EHLO khc.piap.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751140AbYICMT5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:19:57 -0400
To: Mike Isely <isely@pobox.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       v4l-dvb maintainer list <v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org>
Subject: Re: CodingStyle question: multiple statements on a single line
References: <200809030021.00122.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
	<ada7i9ufa7x.fsf@cisco.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0809021830400.17907@cnc.isely.net>
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:19:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809021830400.17907@cnc.isely.net> (Mike Isely's message of "Tue\, 2 Sep 2008 18\:50\:44 -0500 \(CDT\)")
Message-ID: <m3prnll8ur.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Mike Isely <isely@isely.net> writes:

> That's great.  How does one reconcile this statement with subsystem 
> maintainers who treat checkpatch.pl - which is the epitome of 
> "mechanical rule" and has no notion of common sense - as the gatekeeper 
> for all incoming changesets?

They need a doctor ASAP. But I don't know of any such maintainer.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa