From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about stable kernel development
Date: 12 Nov 2003 15:48:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r80d8wxp.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311100851190.16790-100000@logos.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> writes:
> > After 2.4.23-rcX becomes final 2.4.23, the 2.4.24-preX would become
> > 2.4.24-rc1 and would be a base for 2.4.25-pre1.
>
> I really dont understand this "be a base for 2.4.25-pre1".
Is the same way as 2.4.24 will be - i.e. from a -pre kernel point of
view, last -rc = final.
> I guess what you mean is you want a separate 2.4.24-pre tree accepting
> "-pre" patches while 2.4.23-rc is "in stage" accepting critical bugfixes
> only.
Yes.
The advantage is simple - the maintainer has to evaluate the same set
of patches once (no increase in work here) and the only additional thing
(s)he must do is deciding which (-pre and -rc or only -rc) kernels does
it go in.
--
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-12 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-09 18:41 Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-09 19:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-12 15:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-09 19:06 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-11-12 15:07 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-12 16:04 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-11-12 16:51 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-13 7:33 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-11-13 19:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-09 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-09 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-11-09 20:41 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-11-09 19:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-11-12 15:01 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-09 19:50 ` John Bradford
2003-11-09 23:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-10 8:53 ` John Bradford
2003-11-09 23:54 ` Rob Landley
2003-11-10 8:50 ` John Bradford
2003-11-11 7:47 ` Ryan Anderson
2003-11-11 8:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-11 8:53 ` John Bradford
2003-11-10 10:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-12 14:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2003-11-10 13:35 ` jlnance
2003-11-12 14:43 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-10 16:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-11-12 14:40 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-11-09 21:53 Matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3r80d8wxp.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome