From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761258AbYDKVqW (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:46:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756059AbYDKVqM (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:46:12 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:40270 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756054AbYDKVqL (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:46:11 -0400 To: Marc Perkel Cc: Chris Snook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AMD Quad Core clock problem? References: <821384.64293.qm@web52504.mail.re2.yahoo.com> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:46:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <821384.64293.qm@web52504.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (Marc Perkel's message of "Fri\, 11 Apr 2008 14\:36\:31 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marc Perkel writes: > No - it's not wild like it was back in the early X2 > days and I think you're right about the drift being > normal. Few seconds an hour is hardly normal, thats 0.1%. The prime suspect is probably the motherboard and it's faulty clock generator (one of - HPET's?). What motherboard is it? -- Krzysztof Halasa