From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752023AbWFWUYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:24:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752031AbWFWUYS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:24:18 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:466 "EHLO khc.piap.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023AbWFWUYR (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:24:17 -0400 To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: "Jean Delvare" , "LKML" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpufreq_{conservative,ondemand} compilation References: From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:24:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Venkatesh Pallipadi's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:20:23 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" writes: > Thanks for the patch. Yes, I had missed this warning as some other patch > in my local tree was adding cpu.h to cpufreq_ondemand.c BTW: why can't we have "ondemand" (and others) by default (only "performance" or "userspace")? -- Krzysztof Halasa