From: Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: prevent get_user pages call from kernel thread(v2)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:02:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zlouceb7.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tzf3qlz7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Sun\, 06 Jul 2008 13\:40\:44 +0200")
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
> Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> writes:
>
>> Yes... everybody know that it is bad to write from kernel thread, and it is
>> madness to do it with O_DIRECT. But occasionly file with O_DIRECT flag
>> may be passed to loop device via LOOP_SET_FD. So if file-system has't
>> address_space ops, or simply hide it like GFS, it is possible to kill kernel
>> via two lines program. In fact we can't effectively guard kernel space by
>> deny O_DIRECT in loop's code, because user space can set it via
>> fcntl(,F_SETFL,). Let's simply add sanity check mm related logic.
>
> Wouldn't it be better if loop simply dup()ed the file descriptor
> and then checked the flag? Presumably other fd flags could
> do bad things inside loop too.
Off course this can't work because both fd refer to the same struct file.
man fcntl:
File status flags
Each open file description has certain associated status flags, ini-
tialized by open(2) and possibly modified by fcntl(2). Duplicated
file descriptors (made with dup(2), fcntl(F_DUPFD), fork(2), etc.)
refer to the same open file description, and thus share the same
file status flags.
>
> -Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-07 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 17:19 Dmitri Monakhov
2008-07-06 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-07 8:02 ` Dmitri Monakhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3zlouceb7.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome