mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: prevent get_user pages call from kernel thread(v2)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:02:20 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zlouceb7.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tzf3qlz7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Sun\, 06 Jul 2008 13\:40\:44 +0200")

Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:

> Dmitri Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> writes:
>
>> Yes... everybody know that it is bad to write from kernel thread, and it is
>> madness to do it with O_DIRECT. But occasionly file with O_DIRECT flag
>> may be passed to loop device via LOOP_SET_FD. So if file-system has't
>> address_space ops, or simply hide it like GFS, it is possible to kill kernel
>> via two lines program. In fact we can't effectively guard kernel space by
>> deny O_DIRECT in loop's code, because user space can set it via
>> fcntl(,F_SETFL,). Let's simply add sanity check mm related logic.	
>
> Wouldn't it be better if loop simply dup()ed the file descriptor
> and then checked the flag?  Presumably other fd flags could
> do bad things inside loop too.
Off course this can't work because both fd refer to the same struct file.
man fcntl:
 File status flags
       Each open file description has certain associated status flags, ini-
       tialized  by  open(2) and possibly modified by fcntl(2).  Duplicated
       file descriptors (made with dup(2), fcntl(F_DUPFD),  fork(2),  etc.)
       refer  to  the  same  open file description, and thus share the same
       file status flags.
>
> -Andi

      reply	other threads:[~2008-07-07  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-05 17:19 Dmitri Monakhov
2008-07-06 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-07  8:02   ` Dmitri Monakhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3zlouceb7.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru \
    --to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome