From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F4A23B62C for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758191767; cv=none; b=a1BTCSrFcmWyII6zmW6NCsY1XTHeSYSIOUuywQvisKBZ8crbecd51Fj9jA8EOeB1KF5oKUX/Z0CrWX8/MNfOTiO/pCJbHquuq53TLzqsTMRxt1iHEFS6/EeD0dEApHbtU2QK69WEEhv08wQQXueBq6/j80iDI8tTNzDsUZgSTjw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758191767; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mZX5B1t7YSBW9QkRnh+ZDz1Rd/PMlNLLBRIAPafjyqs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FI0TL3jYnYlcszU0KiuPVlO6YnCj1SWoJDNKAeUL+rYCkpeIUsfZI/J6CdcmdF9klhTOmmG5Go5gZfBUC1UXJrQwrY4kDi7iJQYfiAfHnhqy3H7homBT16yXLtDJ2wjRTRnx0jD1hAEkInXGbz1VBrohOykoWvKgKoQmyi5W4W4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fz/6zZL0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fz/6zZL0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64085C4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:36:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758191767; bh=mZX5B1t7YSBW9QkRnh+ZDz1Rd/PMlNLLBRIAPafjyqs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fz/6zZL0PAGE1z0p2ms1Dh2wy28tKMl7oNKY8JwicGiteN5NCKn0g689nlEuCrbzb NaKK560c/yH7EgZ7p5MM1Tr4LngKm2VDM0u8P36cmot9SSElPNKEf1K3sC5f0C6XUP 4SZ+RDR6NpLCbIAMdogqTjWvzm/XM9yY0k8hgLrGrx4gLYXe4X+tUq5TH324GFCPWT /KfIS8vbv/qopXT9nsg+YSvPwJPkgJga3b6YKXSjcrvb6tdjvW5mEn7yG7CWPCWqIC A/1eyl51xk4hfh9iJ0mRVLO3Zdbd9mSPn4gbJnga534wRGJpBuV3ic6sPSeACCNtNM SIL79ex3q3z4w== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Graf , Baoquan He , Changyuan Lyu , Chris Li , Jason Gunthorpe , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt In-Reply-To: <20250917174033.3810435-5-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20250917174033.3810435-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20250917174033.3810435-5-rppt@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Sep 17 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > KHO test stores physical addresses of the preserved folios directly in > fdt. > Use kho_preserve_vmalloc() instead of it and kho_restore_vmalloc() to > retrieve the addresses after kexec. > > This makes the test more scalable from one side and adds tests coverage > for kho_preserve_vmalloc() from the other. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav