From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Thumshirn" <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: Destroy IDRs on module exit
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:48:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mqd1tgb816o.fsf@c203.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714101948.GA17240@earth> (Sebastian Reichel's message of "Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:19:48 +0200")
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> writes:
> [+CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, for being very active in lib/idr.c]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:16:14AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> Destroy IDRs on module exit, freeing the resources for
>> * bq2415x_charger.c
>> * ds2782_battery.c
>> * ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
>
> You missed bq27x00_battery.c. Maybe a coccinelle script should be
> written?
I already did this one that last week (I think), it should've been in
your INBOX (I hope).
>> The drivers had to be converted to "ordinary" module_init()/module_exit()
>> style drivers instead of using module_i2c_driver.
>
> mh I would prefer another solution. How about adding something
> like this:
>
> static void idr_remove_and_destroy(struct idr *idp, int id)
> {
> idr_remove(idp, id);
> if (idr_is_empty(idp)
> idr_destroy(idp);
> }
>
> If that is called by the drivers instead of idr_remove(), there
> should be no need for adding idr_destroy to module_exit().
>
This would be an option.
[Copied a part of Palin's reply in here as well]
Palin> I'm feeling that there is something wrong with idr API. There is no idr
Palin> code in __init functions, so why it is needed for __exit? idr functions
Palin> are used in devices, not in global module.
but I start getting a bit puzzled about the whole IDR thing. Further
grepping through the tree revealed even more drivers doing
DEFINE_ID{A,R} but not all doing the destroy calls afterwards. Maybe
Tejun can clarify on this.
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 9:16 Johannes Thumshirn
2015-07-14 9:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2015-07-14 9:20 ` Pali Rohár
2015-07-14 10:19 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-07-14 10:48 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2015-07-14 12:14 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mqd1tgb816o.fsf@c203.arch.suse.de \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome