From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932884Ab0EDRgP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 13:36:15 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:38295 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932705Ab0EDRgN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 13:36:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100420230719.GB1432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100420155122.6f2c26eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100420230719.GB1432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Marcelo Jimenez Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:35:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Suspicious compilation warning To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Christoph Lameter , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim , KOSAKI Motohiro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 20:07, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Well, it'll be about this number on everything using sparsemem extreme: > > #define SECTIONS_PER_ROOT       (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof (struct mem_section)) > > and with only 32 sections, this is going to give a NR_SECTION_ROOTS value > of zero.  I think the calculation of NR_SECTIONS_ROOTS is wrong. > > #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS        (NR_MEM_SECTIONS / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT) > > Clearly if we have 1 mem section, we want to have one section root, so > I think this division should round up any fractional part, thusly: > > #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS        ((NR_MEM_SECTIONS + SECTIONS_PER_ROOT - 1) / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT) Seems correct to me, Is there any idea when this gets committed? Regards, Marcelo.