From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764AbWG1Cqo (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:46:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751318AbWG1Cqn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:46:43 -0400 Received: from relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([202.136.32.45]:48068 "EHLO relay02.mail-hub.dodo.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWG1Cqn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:46:43 -0400 From: Grant Coady To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, willy@w.ods.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: Linux v2.4.33-rc3 (and a new v2.4 maintainer) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:46:31 +1000 Organization: http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/ Reply-To: Grant Coady Message-ID: References: <200607280216.k6S2GgiJ009955@harpo.it.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <200607280216.k6S2GgiJ009955@harpo.it.uu.se> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:16:42 +0200 (MEST), Mikael Pettersson wrote: >On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:30:19 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >>Here goes the third (and hopefully last) release candidate of v2.4.33. > >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.33-rc3.bz2 >is only 854 bytes long, and once bunzip2:ed it looks like it's the >incremental diff between rc2 and rc3. Usually the full pre/rc patches >go in testing/ with the incrementals going into testing/incr/. > >No big deal, but it would feel better with a proper -rc3 patch there. > Yeah, stuff happens ;) At the moment one needs 2.4.32 plus patches -rc2 and -rc3, like you say, very obvious from patch file sizes ;) At least -rc3 goes okay on 7 of 7 test boxen here: Cheers, Grant.