From: "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>
To: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm/rmap.c negative page map count BUG.
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:00:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.s2w4pyqm4oyyg1@octavio.tecbc.mx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060105111520.GL20809@redhat.com>
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:15:20 -0800, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > > Quite a few Fedora users have hit it over the last year,
> > > but what I find fascinating is that there's not a single
> > > occurance of "BUG at mm/rmap.c" in our 2.6.9 based RHEL4 bug
> reports.
> >
> > could mean it's caused by consumer hardware code...
>
> Yeah. People buying enterprise distros do tend to buy branded RAM
> with goodies like ECC from big name suppliers instead of a cheap $20
> noname DIMM from "Joe's computers".
>
> So it *could* be a lot of these are crappy hardware, especially
> as some of the reports do indicate that the problem went away
> when they upgraded their RAM. Some of the others though, I'm
> not so sure.
Nevertheless, there are more instances of the bug in recent versions.
For me, version 2.6.10 or 2.6.11 seems to be the big difference, from
1 bug monthly to --suddenly-- 4 weekly.
I'm experiecing that problem too. I have notice that sometimes
"bad_page_state" trigger before the BUG is reported.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/14/449
I have already installed the instrumentation Dave provided. I'll see how
it goes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-05 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-03 8:26 Dave Jones
2006-01-03 11:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-03 13:53 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-04 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-04 23:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-05 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-05 0:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-05 7:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-05 8:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-05 11:15 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-05 11:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-05 11:26 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-05 19:00 ` Octavio Alvarez [this message]
2006-01-11 8:01 ` Octavio Alvarez Piza
2006-01-11 16:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-11 16:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-11 16:58 ` Octavio Alvarez Piza
2006-01-11 17:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-11 17:24 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.s2w4pyqm4oyyg1@octavio.tecbc.mx \
--to=alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®