From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754924Ab2JBI4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 04:56:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.getmail.no ([84.208.15.66]:42745 "EHLO smtp.getmail.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752451Ab2JBI4v (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 04:56:51 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes In-reply-to: <1349064397.6957.26.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: <1349064397.6957.26.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c To: Mike Galbraith Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:56:48 +0200 From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem Message-id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.02 (Win32) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is just too much code for me to do a quick patch on. It really needs to be evaulated with concerns to what an optimal scheduler is. That would be to operate on actual system load ofcourse, not a filtered system load that doesn`t represent what is actually happening on a computer. What you can do for the time being is just set it to 1nS. If that doesn`t negatively impact anything, then you know it is bogus. Peace Be With You.