From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem <uwaysi.bin.kareem@paradoxuncreated.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Jitter
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:56:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.wmlt47ws6426ze@millennium.getinternet.no> (raw)
As those who have seen my posts on LKML, I am all about jitter.
10 years ago I said why not do an OpenGL desktop, and now we have wayland.
10 years ago, I said, don`t do excessive buffering, and now we have
"fighting bufferbloat".
10 years ago, I talked about how responsive vintage computers was, without
"OS".
And I have taken that further, and now work with low-jitter for the
desktop. Low latency all the way, or atleast down to 0.2ms max latency and
jitter.
In the mean time, the masses are unaware of jitter, unless it is very
noticable such as recent discussions on "microstutter".
Most still advise to "not turn off services" in windows, yet show me
benchmarks of "motherboards" with DPC latency of 50-300uS. I am already
running at 5uS in windows here. And it is not "the motherboard". This is
about OS-jitter.
And in linux, I am running with even less jitter, now trying rt-patch only
at "low latency" preemption yet, but still. And even in the linuxcommunity
many seem not to understand. Those who do are much higher then on windows
though. And while many also make completely absurd statements and attack
what I am doing, I am very happily running what feels like a high
performance computer. With a lot of activity being there on the next
frame, and ultrasmooth framerates in OpenGL. Indeed optimizing and
removing jitter, seeing improvements on what goes on, on the highest
performing bus in the computer, seems to improve general desktop computing.
I think I have tried most things now, and unless you want to wait 10 years
for people to catch on, you should consider low-jitter aswell.
And I am also interested in any patches that currently are not mainline. -
Please repost in this thread if you have any. Or any other information, or
ongoing development. If it is not all in the RT patch, that is.
Peace Be With You.
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 23:56 Uwaysi Bin Kareem [this message]
2012-10-23 10:29 ` Jitter Uwaysi Bin Kareem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.wmlt47ws6426ze@millennium.getinternet.no \
--to=uwaysi.bin.kareem@paradoxuncreated.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®