From: "Christopher Hall" <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:18:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.x6r25dza1774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510151014330.3960@nanos>
Thomas,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:15:57 -0700, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
wrote:
>> >
>> > > +#define SHADOW_HISTORY_DEPTH 7
>> >
>> > And that number is 7 because?
>>
>> Due to power of 2 it will be 8 instead. As above the useful history is
>> 8-2*1
>> ms (1 ms is the minimum jiffy length). Array size 4 would not be enough
>> history for the DSP which requires 4 ms of history, in the worst case.
>
> And how exactly becomes 7 magically 8?
I'm making the array size a power of two, per your suggestion.
In my view, the candidate array sizes are 4 and 8. But the DSP driver
code requires that it be at least 8. Here is my reasoning:
The number of shadow_timekeeper array elements that contain useful history
is n-2 where n is the size of the shadow_timekeeper array. This is true
because shadow_timekeeper[shadow_index] is a copy of tk_core.timekeeper
(this isn't history). The next entry of the shadow_timekeeper array may
be in-flight and contain invalid information, because update_wall_time()
makes changes to the next entry of shadow timekeeper outside of the
sequence lock. If that occurs, get_correlated_timestamp() would not be
notified of this change through a change in sequence number.
Combining these two requirements, the candidate array sizes and their
effective history sizes is:
Array Size Effective History (in elements)
========== ===============================
4 2
8 6
16 14
update_wall_clock() checks that the number of elapsed cycles is >=
tk->cycle_interval before performing any updates to shadow_timekeeper.
The minimum cycle count (and minimum time) that is contained in each
history element is equal to cycle_interval which represents a time period
of 1/HZ seconds. The smallest configurable period for cycle_interval is 1
ms (in cycles). Each history element, therefore, is guaranteed to contain
1 ms of history for all kernel configurations. For correct operation of
the DSP using the proposed ART->system time API we need at least 4 ms of
history. To guarantee this much history is available, the array size
needs to be 8.
Array Size Minimum Effective History (in ms)
========== =================================
4 2
8 6 <----
16 14
Does this make sense for the choice of array size 8?
> Make it a seperate function which can hand in the information and
> leave the PTP specific sample/conversion function alone.
OK. The audio driver code will conform to the original correlated
clocksource API.
FYI, I will be away from work and email until 10/28. Any responses will
be delayed until then.
Thanks,
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 18:45 [PATCH v4 0/4] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 4:58 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 7:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13 8:31 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13 21:12 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14 7:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14 9:29 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-14 14:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14 16:18 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15 2:34 ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15 5:41 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13 5:26 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 13:50 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-13 19:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-15 1:57 ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-15 5:57 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15 8:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 0:18 ` Christopher Hall [this message]
2015-10-20 0:36 ` John Stultz
2015-10-20 8:54 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 11:51 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 14:55 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 19:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:36 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-20 20:16 ` John Stultz
2015-10-21 7:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-03 19:18 ` Stanton, Kevin B
2015-11-09 21:17 ` John Stultz
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Always running timer " Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 2:03 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-18 23:53 ` Jacob Pan
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Add PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE for driver crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 13:59 ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-15 2:47 ` Christopher Hall
2015-11-07 2:15 ` Christopher Hall
2015-10-12 18:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Adds hardware supported cross timestamp Christopher S. Hall
2015-10-13 2:10 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13 2:11 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-13 2:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.x6r25dza1774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.b.stanton@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®