From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.com) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 00:27:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.com) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 00:27:00 -0400 Received: from geos.coastside.net ([207.213.212.4]:30139 "EHLO geos.coastside.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 00:26:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010511232031.A2314@bacchus.dhis.org> In-Reply-To: <80BTbI6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <20010511133242.B3224@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010511232031.A2314@bacchus.dhis.org> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 21:21:41 -0700 To: Ralf Baechle From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 11:20 PM -0300 2001-05-11, Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:49:05PM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > >It's 998 plus a CR/LF sequence which is 1000 bytes, not exactly an odd >number. And it's the official successor of RFC 822 which was an official >STD. What I meant by "strange" was that it's neither so large a number that keeping track is not a concern, nor so small that it fits on a screen (or is reasonable to scroll). Yes, it does appear to be a standard; I was confused because it hadn't propagated everywhere. -- /Jonathan Lundell.