From: Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>,
"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>,
Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Ragnar Kjxrstad <kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mike@bigstorage.com, kevin@bigstorage.com, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:49:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p0510030ab77546a455f2@[10.128.7.49]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107132204.f6DM4TR3014602@webber.adilger.int>
In-Reply-To: <200107132204.f6DM4TR3014602@webber.adilger.int>
At 4:04 PM -0600 2001-07-13, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>**) As I said in my previous posting, it depends on if/how MD RAID does
> write ordering of I/O to the data sector and the parity sector. If
> it holds back the parity write until the data I/O(s) are complete, and
> trusts the data over parity on recovery, you should be OK unless you
> have multiple failures (i.e. bad disk + crash). If it doesn't do this
> ordering, or trusts parity over data, then you are F***ed (I doubt it
> would have this problem).
That wouldn't help, would it, if >1 data sectors were being written.
The fault mode of a sector simply not being written seems like a real
weak point of both RAID-1 and RAID-5. Not that RAID-5 parity ever
gets checked, I think, under normal circumstances, nor RAID-1 mirrors
get compared, but if they were check and there was an parity or
mirror-compare error and no other indication of a fault (eg CRC),
there's no way to recover correct data.
--
/Jonathan Lundell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-14 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-01 4:53 [RFC][PATCH] first cut 64 bit block support Ben LaHaise
2001-07-03 4:53 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-04 2:19 ` [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write Ben LaHaise
2001-07-04 7:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-05 6:34 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-05 7:35 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-13 18:20 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-13 20:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-13 21:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-13 22:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-14 0:49 ` Jonathan Lundell [this message]
2001-07-14 12:27 ` Paul Jakma
2001-07-14 14:48 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 15:42 ` Paul Jakma
2001-07-14 17:18 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-20 17:03 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-07-16 18:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-07-16 19:13 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-13 21:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-14 3:23 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-14 8:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-14 14:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 20:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 1:21 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-15 1:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 3:36 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 6:05 ` John Alvord
2001-07-15 6:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 13:16 ` Ken Hirsch
2001-07-15 14:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 22:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-17 0:31 ` Juan Quintela
2001-07-15 13:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-15 14:39 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-15 15:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 16:24 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 15:22 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 17:44 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 17:47 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2001-07-15 23:14 ` Rod Van Meter
2001-07-16 0:37 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-16 15:11 ` Rod Van Meter
2001-07-16 8:56 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-16 13:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-16 1:08 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-16 8:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-21 19:18 ` Alexander Griesser
2001-07-22 3:52 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-23 14:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 4:29 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-07-24 11:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-14 15:41 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-14 17:00 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-14 17:33 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 4:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 5:46 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-15 17:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-15 17:39 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-26 2:18 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-07-26 16:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-10 19:42 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-10 19:51 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-08-10 20:02 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-11 0:18 ` Steve Lord
2001-08-11 21:44 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-07-04 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] first cut 64 bit block support Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-04 16:59 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-14 15:08 [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write Ed Tomlinson
2001-07-19 7:35 [PATCH] 64 bit SCSI read/write Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='p0510030ab77546a455f2@[10.128.7.49]' \
--to=jlundell@pobox.com \
--cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=kevin@bigstorage.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=mike@bigstorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®