From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261239AbVFULsJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:48:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261192AbVFUL0z (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:26:55 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:65419 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261199AbVFULO1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:14:27 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 21 Jun 2005 13:14:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > perfctr > > Not yet, but getting closer. The PPC64 guys still need to sort out a > few interface issues with Mikael. We might be able to fit this into > 2.6.13 if people get a move on. So the problems IA64 had with this are resolved now? Unfortunately there is a perfmon for i386/x86-64 implementation floating around now (with some unmergeable stuff but might be fixable) which is kind of competing now :/ > reiser4 > > Merge it, I guess. > > The patches still contain all the reiser4-specific namespace > enhancements, only it is disabled, so it is effectively dead code. Maybe > we should ask that it actually be removed? Has there been actually any serious review on this? Last time I looked there was a lot of very ugly code in there. Also I'm not sure things like comming with an own profiler and spinlock debugger are really acceptable. At least this stuff should be removed too. -Andi