From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262066AbTFXPrK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:47:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262148AbTFXPrK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:47:10 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:58888 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262066AbTFXPrF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:47:05 -0400 To: "Vamsi Krishna S ." Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] kprobes for 2.5.73 with single-stepping out-of-line References: <20030624140926.A17908@in.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 24 Jun 2003 18:01:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030624140926.A17908@in.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Vamsi Krishna S ." writes: > +static struct kprobe *current_kprobe; This global variable is quite unclean. It looks like it is for passing function arguments around. Why is it needed? > +#define KPROBE_HASH_BITS 6 > +#define KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE (1 << KPROBE_HASH_BITS) > + > +static struct list_head kprobe_table[KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE]; Use hlists? -Andi