From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbXC0OYQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:24:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753881AbXC0OYQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:24:16 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60262 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753880AbXC0OYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:24:15 -0400 To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Nick Piggin , Ravikiran G Thirumalai , Ingo Molnar , Nikita Danilov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] queued spinlocks (i386) References: <20070325155407.GA497@tv-sign.ru> From: Andi Kleen Date: 27 Mar 2007 17:22:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070325155407.GA497@tv-sign.ru> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov writes: > > Makes sense? Or stupid? Interesting idea. Probably worth testing. -Andi