From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265231AbUBIOpL (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:45:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265232AbUBIOpL (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:45:11 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50154 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265231AbUBIOpI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:45:08 -0500 To: Miquel van Smoorenburg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? References: <20040209100940.GF21151@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20040209104729.GA19401@traveler.cistron.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 09 Feb 2004 15:45:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040209104729.GA19401@traveler.cistron.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miquel van Smoorenburg writes: > > Well, nothing really, but removing BSD style support in the 2.6 series > now will break existing installations. Doing it in 2.7 would be fine. It will still break existing installations even in 2.7. And breaking early user space is especially nasty to recover from. Somehow I cannot believe keeping them around for compatibility is a unduly burden. Please don't remove them. -Andi