mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nanosecond file timestamp resolution in filesystems, GNU make, etc.
Date: 28 Oct 2002 12:05:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73u1j6su0i.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Paul Eggert's message of "28 Oct 2002 10:55:39 +0100"

Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> writes:
> 
> > Another way would be to round on flush, but that also has some problems :-
> 
> Rounding is even worse.  GNU Make assumes truncation, i.e. it assumes
> that a timestamp is truncated (floored, actually) when it is stored on
> a non-nanosecond-aware filesystem.

That is what my patchkit does currently, so I guess it should work fine.

> 
> > In my current patchkit I just chose to truncate because that was the 
> > easiest and the other more complicated solutions didn't offer any 
> > compeling advantage.
> 
> Can't you truncate/floor to filesystem timestamp resolution
> immediately, i.e., before the inode is flushed?  That would address
> the problems that I see.

That would complicate the timestamp management in the kernel considerably.
I'm not sure if I want to do that, probably not.

-Andi


       reply	other threads:[~2002-10-28 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20021027153651.GB26297@pimlott.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <200210280947.g9S9l9H01162@sic.twinsun.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-10-28 11:05   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20021028102809.GA16062@bjl1.asuk.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-10-28 11:08     ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-28 12:56       ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 14:15         ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-28 14:28           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-10-28 15:13             ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 15:40               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-10-28 15:59                 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-28 15:17           ` Jamie Lokier
     [not found] <20021027153651.GB26297@pimlott.net>
2002-10-28  9:47 ` Paul Eggert
2002-10-28 10:28   ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73u1j6su0i.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=eggert@twinsun.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®