From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932452AbVH3UmY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:42:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932451AbVH3UmY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:42:24 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:20669 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932453AbVH3UmX (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:42:23 -0400 To: Jeff Dike Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken References: <200508292007.j7TK72Or029927@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> From: Andi Kleen Date: 30 Aug 2005 22:42:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200508292007.j7TK72Or029927@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Dike writes: > Noticed by Al Viro - SMP on x86_64 is fundamentally broken due to > UML's reuse of the host arch's percpu stuff. This is OK on x86, but > the x86_64 pda stuff just won't work for UML. The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient. So you can probably easily replace them. -Andi