From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261306AbVGGPvp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:51:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261314AbVGGPvo (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:51:44 -0400 Received: from [66.150.84.1] ([66.150.84.1]:38552 "EHLO rowdy.as.in.athenacr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261306AbVGGPv3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:51:29 -0400 From: Andres Salomon Subject: Re: tg3 driver fails Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:51:16 -0400 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Message-Id: Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc References: <20050706.160821.74746394.davem@redhat.com> <20050707.030818.102573301.davem@redhat.com> To: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:06:37 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > like this one. And no, ladies and gentlemen; the GPL is *not* a valid > license for binary firmware. The key wording here is "The source code for I should be more explicit; I'm talking about binary-only firmware. Obviously, if the firmware source is made available, the GPL is a fine choice of license.